i guess weight never changed the metric, it just gave the final decision between two routes of equal cost/hopcount. (but not toally sure never really used it)<div><br></div><div><div>nearest equivalent is using lqmult, but it affects olsrd routing globally, not just local as the weight likely was doing it,.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Markus</div><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Michael Rack <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael.rack@rsm-freilassing.de">michael.rack@rsm-freilassing.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<tt>Yes it should change the metric for this route. But it does not.<br>
<br>
Here is a example how the routing looks like from txt_info-Plugin:<br>
<br>
</tt><tt>VIEW IS FROM INTERNET-ROUTER</tt> as specified in my last
mail in section Network-Design / Schema...<br>
<br>
The focus is on <tt><a href="http://172.16.12.160/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.160/27</a> it should be routed via
"bond0"</tt><br>
<tt>
<blockquote type="cite">ROUTE HOST
Metric Interface<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.32/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.32/27</a> 172.16.12.4 1 1.000 bond5 # ROUTER B.1<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.96/28" target="_blank">172.16.12.96/28</a> 172.16.12.4 2 2.000 bond5 # ROUTER B.2<br>
hidden node on metric 3<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.128/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.128/27</a> 172.16.12.4 4 4.000 bond5 # ROUTER C<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.160/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.160/27</a> 172.16.12.4 5 5.128 bond5 # ROUTER D<br>
<br>
<a href="http://172.16.13.160/27" target="_blank">172.16.13.160/27</a> 172.16.12.5 1 1.000 bond0 # <tt>ROUTER
A.1</tt><br>
<a href="http://172.16.14.32/27" target="_blank">172.16.14.32/27</a> 172.16.12.5 2 2.000 bond0 # <tt>ROUTER
A.2</tt><br>
<a href="http://172.16.13.32/27" target="_blank">172.16.13.32/27</a> 172.16.12.5 3 3.000 bond0 # <tt>ROUTER
A.3</tt></blockquote>
This route should only been selected if "bond0" failed.<br>
<br>
This is the route as it should be:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">ROUTE HOST
Metric Interface<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.32/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.32/27</a> 172.16.12.4 1 1.000 bond5 # ROUTER B.1<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.96/28" target="_blank">172.16.12.96/28</a> 172.16.12.4 2 2.000 bond5 # ROUTER B.2<br>
<br>
<a href="http://172.16.13.160/27" target="_blank">172.16.13.160/27</a> 172.16.12.5 1 1.000 bond0 # ROUTER A.1<br>
<a href="http://172.16.14.32/27" target="_blank">172.16.14.32/27</a> 172.16.12.5 2 2.000 bond0 # ROUTER A.2<br>
<a href="http://172.16.13.32/27" target="_blank">172.16.13.32/27</a> 172.16.12.5 3 3.000 bond0 # ROUTER A.3<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.128/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.128/27</a> 172.16.12.5 4 4.000 bond0 # ROUTER C<br>
<a href="http://172.16.12.160/27" target="_blank">172.16.12.160/27</a> 172.16.12.5 5 5.000 bond0 # ROUTER D</blockquote>
<br>
So the weight parameter does not apply. Is this a bug in OLSR?<br>
<br>
The weight </tt><tt>parameter </tt><tt>is activated on </tt><tt>ROUTER
C.<br>
</tt><tt>ROUTER C sees </tt><tt>ROUTER A.3 and </tt><tt>ROUTER
B.2.<br>
</tt><tt><br>
ROUTER C gives </tt><tt>ROUTER A.3 a weight of 5 and </tt><tt>ROUTER
C weight of 10. </tt>So <tt>ROUTER A.3 should be selected.</tt><div class="im"><br>
<br>
<pre cols="72">Liebe Grüße aus Freilassing,
Michael Rack
RSM Freilassing
--
RSM Freilassing Tel.: <a href="tel:%2B49%208654%20607110" value="+498654607110" target="_blank">+49 8654 607110</a>
Nocksteinstr. 13 Fax.: <a href="tel:%2B49%208654%20670438" value="+498654670438" target="_blank">+49 8654 670438</a>
D-83395 Freilassing <a href="http://www.rsm-freilassing.de" target="_blank">www.rsm-freilassing.de</a> </pre>
<br></div><div class="im">
Am 29.03.2012 17:15, schrieb Markus Kittenberger:
</div><blockquote type="cite">i guess the weight does/did only with hopcount
metric,..
<div><div class="h5"><div><br>
</div>
<div>Markus</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>p.s. true 0.5.5 is a previous version, but this was very very
very long ago. (-;<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM,
Michael Rack <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael.rack@rsm-freilassing.de" target="_blank">michael.rack@rsm-freilassing.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear
olsr-users!<br>
<br>
I have a bad behavior and hope to get some help.<br>
<br>
I run only P2P Links (AP & STA) via wireless-lan and
direct ethernet connections. Every node runs currently olsr
version 0.6.0.<br>
<br>
The Problem:<br>
I have several upstreams and like to define which upstrem to
be used via the weight parameter. In previous versions of
olsr this worked fine (as i can remember v0.5.5). Now it
dosn't.<br>
<br>
My Settings:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Willingness 3<br>
LinkQualityLevel 2<br>
LinkQualityAlgorithm "etx_ff"<br>
UseHysteresis no<br>
TcRedundancy 2<br>
MprCoverage 1<br>
<br>
InterfaceDefaults<br>
{<br>
Ip4Broadcast 255.255.255.2555<br>
HelloInterval 2.0<br>
HelloValidityTime 60.0<br>
TcInterval 5.0<br>
TcValidityTime 120.0<br>
MidInterval 5.0<br>
MidValidityTime 120.0<br>
HnaInterval 5.0<br>
HnaValidityTime 120.0<br>
}<br>
<br>
Interface "wan"<br>
{<br>
Mode "ether"<br>
Weight 10<br>
}<br>
<br>
Interface "vlan2"<br>
{<br>
Mode "ether"<br>
Weight 2<br>
}<br>
<br>
Interface "vlan4"<br>
{<br>
Mode "ether"<br>
Weight 5<br>
}<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
But currently the wan-interface is selected. While
everything goes via "wan" the routing change to "vlan4" but
after a few minutes the routing switch back to "wan" and i
get a bad packet-loss for 4 seconds while the routing is
switching back to "wan" - but i don't know why because both
links are up and running. I don't know where the packets get
loosed.<br>
<br>
Currently Network-Design:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
INTERNET-ROUTER<br>
|<br>
/ ------- / \ ------- \<br>
ROUTER A.1 ROUTER B.1<br>
| |<br>
ROUTER A.2 ROUTER B.2<br>
| |<br>
ROUTER A.3 |<br>
| |<br>
\ --------\ / ------- /<br>
"vlan4" | "wan"<br>
ROUTER C<br>
|<br>
ROUTER D<br>
|<br>
CLIENT<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
MTR is done via ROUTER D and the internet. The routing
decision is made on Router C that is multihomed (A.3 &
B.2).<br>
<br>
So what have i to do, to make WEIGHT working?<br>
<br>
Liebe Grüße aus Freilassing,<br>
<br>
Michael Rack<br>
RSM Freilassing<span><font color="#888888"><br>
-- <br>
RSM Freilassing Tel.: <a href="tel:%2B49%208654%20607110" value="+498654607110" target="_blank">+49 8654 607110</a><br>
Nocksteinstr. 13 Fax.: <a href="tel:%2B49%208654%20670438" value="+498654670438" target="_blank">+49 8654 670438</a><br>
D-83395 Freilassing <a href="http://www.rsm-freilassing.de" target="_blank">www.rsm-freilassing.de</a><br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Olsr-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org" target="_blank">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>