<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/06/2014 02:58 PM, Vigneswaran R
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:539189AA.2080701@atc.tcs.com" type="cite">On
06/06/2014 02:23 PM, Vigneswaran R wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 06/06/2014 01:01 PM, Henning Rogge
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bastian
Bittorf <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bittorf@bluebottle.com"><bittorf@bluebottle.com></a> wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">* Vigneswaran R
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vignesh@atc.tcs.com"><vignesh@atc.tcs.com></a> [06.06.2014 09:37]:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Could you please help in debugging
these problems? Thanks.
<br>
</blockquote>
can you show is you commandline or config? bye, bastian
<br>
</blockquote>
The output of "ip addr" on every node would also help.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Command Line:
<br>
<br>
./olsrd2 -l olsrd2.conf
<br>
<br>
Configuration file contents:
<br>
<br>
[interface=eth0]
<br>
[interface=eth1]
<br>
<br>
Exception: On R1, only eth1 included.
<br>
<br>
IP Addr: (pfa the complete output)
<br>
<br>
R1: eth0: 1.0.0.2/24 (non-olsr), eth1: 10.1.1.1/32
<br>
R2: eth0: 10.1.2.1/32, eth1: 10.1.2.2/32
<br>
R3: eth0: 10.1.3.1/32, eth1: 10.1.3.2/32
<br>
R4: eth0: 10.1.4.1/32, eth1: 10.1.4.2/32
<br>
<br>
(I am using /32 mask for testing. However, I got the same
problem with /8 mask also).
<br>
<br>
Please let me know if any other information is required.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
PFA the output of the following command on all the nodes. Please
see whether this helps.
<br>
<br>
echo "nhdp neighlink" | nc 127.0.0.1 2009
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Restarted olsrd2 with debug=all and observed the following from the
collected logs,<br>
<br>
1. R1 received TC messages originated from R2 (10.1.2.1) only.<br>
-- Shouldn't it get TC from 10.1.3.1 also? I think, this is the
reason why R1 is not getting route for R4.<br>
<br>
2. R2 received TC messages originated from R3 (10.1.3.1) only.<br>
-- I think, this is fine for the 4 nodes topology.<br>
<br>
3. R3 received TC messages originated from R2 (10.1.2.1) only.<br>
-- this is also fine for the same reason.<br>
<br>
4. R4 received TC messages originated from both R2 (10.1.2.1) and R3
(10.1.3.1). <br>
<br>
If you want me to post specific portions of the log files, please
suggest.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Vignesh<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:539189AA.2080701@atc.tcs.com" type="cite">
<br>
<br>
Regards,
<br>
Vignesh
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>