<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">What I have *is* dynamic. <div><br></div><div>What is missing in OpenVPN: float. With float, the tunnel doesn't depend on smartgateway or whatever, the tunnel would survive changing attachment points. Float is in 2.4 (I hope).</div><div><br></div><div>Teco</div><div><br></div><div> <br><div><div>Op 29 mrt. 2014, om 07:33 heeft Russell Senior <<a href="mailto:russell@personaltelco.net">russell@personaltelco.net</a>> het volgende geschreven:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>We could switch to a static routing regime, but olsr is (has been) nice for handling it all dynamically for us.<br><br></div>Is this limitation in olsr we have encountered correctable in the near term, or should we be looking at converting to static routes?<br>
<br></div>Thanks!<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Teco Boot <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:teco@inf-net.nl" target="_blank">teco@inf-net.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Running a MANET protocol over a VPN hub&spoke infrastructure is not something I recommend. On hub, all TC messages are pushed on all tunnels. Can introduce problems when packet rate isn't shaped.<br>
<br>
What we have is a VPN tunnel for each OLSR router. On spokes, RFC1918 routes go into the tunnel. Hub has /24 routes back, generated from certificate. Scales very well.<br>
<br>
Teco<br>
<br>
Op 28 mrt. 2014, om 14:54 heeft Ferry Huberts <<a href="mailto:mailings@hupie.com">mailings@hupie.com</a>> het volgende geschreven:<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 28/03/14 10:34, Henning Rogge wrote:<br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>> I must admit that I am not convinced that its an Olsrd bug what we are seeing...<br>
>><br>
>> If I see it correctly Olsrd is running over the VPN interface<br>
>> connection (interface name "vpn"), right?<br>
>><br>
>> Is the VPN connection between the nodes still active during the route<br>
>> loss? Most of the nodes seem to have direct connections and the "30<br>
>> seconds until recovery" sounds like an ETX value slowly going down and<br>
>> then dropping the link.<br>
><br>
> 30 seconds is also something we see when our vpn connections break...<br>
><br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> --<br>
> Olsr-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>